Rankings · BAR Fight

Overall rating

Who wins, across every map. A results-based rating: beating strong opposition moves it more.

Game format

21,190 games · 13,507 players · 138 maps · 16 Aug to 12 Oct 2026. Games of 5 minutes or longer.

2_Hawkey_1,747188 games · 51% won 1[AFUS]Trotski2,166133 games · 56% won 3[AFUS]Jagomu1,73861 games · 67% won

Rating is shown as a whole number. Only compare ratings inside one format.

How to read this list

Rating: Starts at 1,000 and moves with match results against the opposing players' OS.
Avg enemy OS: How strong the opposition was, on average. Context only.
Provisional: Fewer than 10 games, so the rating can still move a lot.

SortShowing 1 to 15 of 13,507

Rank	Player						Compare
1	[AFUS]Trotski	2,166	133 games	56% won	35.5	11 Oct · 9 maps · 32 days	Compare · Profile	133 games · 56% won
2	_Hawkey_	1,747	188 games	51% won	33.8	12 Oct · 7 maps · 30 days	Compare · Profile	188 games · 51% won
3	[AFUS]Jagomu	1,738	61 games	67% won	34.6	18 Sep · 1 maps · 20 days	Compare · Profile	61 games · 67% won
4	watermeloans	1,714	125 games	58% won	40.3	6 Oct · 1 maps · 25 days	Compare · Profile	125 games · 58% won
5	HelsHound	1,683	100 games	47% won	43.799 of 100 games	10 Oct · 22 maps · 20 days	Compare · Profile	100 games · 47% won
6	[Grump]Glorp_TTV	1,682	282 games	54% won	33.2	12 Oct · 54 maps · 37 days	Compare · Profile	282 games · 54% won
7	yubiyubi	1,666	73 games	70% won	39.2	9 Oct · 11 maps · 21 days	Compare · Profile	73 games · 70% won
8	Hexu	1,645	95 games	46% won	41.3	11 Oct · 33 maps · 23 days	Compare · Profile	95 games · 46% won
9	TM_SlickLikeVik	1,638	206 games	50% won	41.3201 of 206 games	11 Oct · 55 maps · 38 days	Compare · Profile	206 games · 50% won
10	PRO_Hayaji	1,626	107 games	48% won	39.9	11 Oct · 21 maps · 28 days	Compare · Profile	107 games · 48% won
11	TM_autopilot	1,621	158 games	53% won	40.9154 of 158 games	10 Oct · 42 maps · 40 days	Compare · Profile	158 games · 53% won
12	PRO_HighGaiN	1,611	55 games	56% won	40.9	11 Oct · 23 maps · 16 days	Compare · Profile	55 games · 56% won
13	Nikkoton	1,607	128 games	54% won	34.8	6 Oct · 46 maps · 33 days	Compare · Profile	128 games · 54% won
14	Narnuk	1,606	139 games	50% won	40.2	12 Oct · 34 maps · 26 days	Compare · Profile	139 games · 50% won
15	PlatinumBlonde	1,604	269 games	48% won	38.3	12 Oct · 3 maps · 49 days	Compare · Profile	269 games · 48% won

Who leads each starting position on Supreme Isthmus v2.1, measured from what happened in their games: fighting, income and units built.

P4 and P12 · Front start

Pond

In short

On Pond, 106 players qualify. [AFUS]Trotski leads with 66.4, likely 60.4 to 73.0. 6 of the top 10 have a likely range that overlaps the leader's, so read the order as a rough guide, not a strict ladder.

What to build at Pond Fastest builds from Pond

Ranking games on Supreme Isthmus v2.1, Large teams · 16 players, all game versions, all factions.

Top 100 of 106 players who qualify on Pond. 56 have established results, 44 early results. Latest OS above 30. These rankings are older than a day and a half, so the daily update is running late.

2Rysica60.3Likely 57.3 to 64.0 1[AFUS]Trotski66.4Likely 60.4 to 73.0 3FrugalResources57.8Likely 55.0 to 61.1

The likely ranges of the top three overlap, so their order could change.

How to read the score

Score runs 0 to 100 and 50 is typical for the position. It describes what was measured in games, not skill.

60.4 to 73.0

White mark: the score
Band: the likely range, 95% sure
Pale line: 50, typical
Close raceWithin 0.1 of a neighbour

All bars share one scale, 35 to 75. Where bars overlap, the order could swap.

SortShowing 1 to 15 of 100

Rank	Player		Likely range		OS	Evidence
1	[AFUS]Trotski	66.4	60.4 to 73.0	29 of 33 games	OS 82.7	Solid	29 of 33 games · OS 82.7
2	Rysica	60.3	57.3 to 64.0	27 of 30 games	OS 36.9	Solid-9.8 recently	27 of 30 games · OS 36.9
3	FrugalResourcesClose race	57.8	55.0 to 61.1	21 of 22 games	OS 30.9	Solid	21 of 22 games · OS 30.9
4	YamatoClose race	57.8	55.4 to 60.2	33 of 47 games	OS 30.5	Solid	33 of 47 games · OS 30.5
5	Ram_Me_Daddy	57.3	53.0 to 61.0	8 of 10 games	OS 31.7	Fair	8 of 10 games · OS 31.7
6	luxa_Close race	56.7	52.5 to 64.3	6 of 8 games	OS 33.4	Fair	6 of 8 games · OS 33.4
7	EpicTyrannusClose race	56.6	53.8 to 58.8	38 of 45 games	OS 42.5	Solid	38 of 45 games · OS 42.5
8	RogShotzClose race	56.6	51.7 to 60.4	9 of 10 games	OS 42.7	Fair	9 of 10 games · OS 42.7
9	ViltrumClose race	56.6	53.3 to 59.6	68 of 83 games	OS 40.3	Solid	68 of 83 games · OS 40.3
10	WildesPony8	56.4	53.2 to 59.5	23 of 30 games	OS 31.4	Solid	23 of 30 games · OS 31.4
11	TrapCaTClose race	55.9	51.8 to 60.5	13 of 15 games	OS 42.6	Solid	13 of 15 games · OS 42.6
12	AlphacureClose race	55.9	50.3 to 65.1	5 of 6 games	OS 36.6	Fair	5 of 6 games · OS 36.6
13	TheGeneraI	55.7	50.5 to 60.3	19 of 20 games	OS 32.3	Solid	19 of 20 games · OS 32.3
14	SauceDispenser	55.4	52.4 to 58.4	25 of 33 games	OS 34.4	Solid	25 of 33 games · OS 34.4
15	Teaner	55.2	51.2 to 58.6	46 of 52 games	OS 51.9	Solid	46 of 52 games · OS 51.9

How the position score works

Updated 13 Oct 2026, 15:05 UTC

Measured contribution index. combat balance 45%, metal income 20%, energy income 10%, fighting units built 25%. Each part is compared with other players in the same position, then pulled towards 50 when there are few days of games. The same weights apply on every map and position.

Who is listed: latest recorded OS above 30. Early results need 5 scored games on 3 days. Established results need 10 games on 5 days, with at least 60% of games complete enough to score. A descriptive, provisional index, not proven skill, win probability or a share of team victory. Income can reward greed; completed production omits unfinished investment; combat credit misses assists and useful sacrifices. Factions share a comparison group, so differences in faction balance can affect scores. Matching a patch, settings and starting spot does not establish identical situations.

Mirrored starts are combined. Games with unclear positions are included under All starting positions.

No previous ranking is available for this selection yet.

Method gex-completed-contribution-v3How rankings work

The fastest single game for each big build. A personal best, not an average, and not a build deadline.

Build record

Fusion

Standard land fusion reactors across all three factions. Naval, cloaked and advanced fusion stay separate.

Players with a record

6,160

on Supreme Isthmus v2.1

Fastest recorded

7:10

[Cookie]Baby_Evis · Air

Top 25 spread

0:57

7:10 to 8:07

Fastest games on Supreme Isthmus v2.1, from any position, all game versions, any unit faction.

Fastest game for each player, from any position. 6,160 players have a Fusion record on Supreme Isthmus v2.1.

2Dad_The_Speedrunner7:25Air · 3 Sep 1[Cookie]Baby_Evis7:10Air · 10 Sep 3anasramsey20037:32Air · 6 Sep

A personal best is the fastest finish in one game. Ties share a rank.

SortShowing 1 to 15 of 6,160

Rank	Player		Gap to fastest	Position		Replay	Match context
1	[Cookie]Baby_Evis	7:10	Fastest	Air	10 Sep	Replay	Started as Cortex · 8v8 · version r3125116 games with this build	Fastest · Air · 10 Sep · Replay
2	Dad_The_Speedrunner	7:25	+0:15	Air	3 Sep	Replay	Started as Cortex · 8v8 · version r3117772 games with this build	+0:15 · Air · 3 Sep · Replay
3	anasramsey2003	7:32	+0:23	Air	6 Sep	Replay	Started as Armada · 8v8 · version r3123250 games with this build	+0:23 · Air · 6 Sep · Replay
4	Lexosis	7:33	+0:24	Air	9 Oct	Replay	Started as Cortex · 8v8 · version r3153676 games with this build	+0:24 · Air · 9 Oct · Replay
5	BFCookie	7:41	+0:31	Tech	14 Sep	Replay	Started as Cortex · 8v8 · version r3125152 games with this build	+0:31 · Tech · 14 Sep · Replay
6	Yamato	7:43	+0:33	Air	2 Sep	Replay	Started as Legion · 8v8 · version r3115236 games with this build	+0:33 · Air · 2 Sep · Replay
7	Herbiderpi	7:44	+0:34	Air	22 Sep	Replay	Started as Cortex · 8v8 · version r3136874 games with this build	+0:34 · Air · 22 Sep · Replay
8	Dabba	7:48	+0:38	Air	12 Sep	Replay	Started as Cortex · 8v8 · version r3125117 games with this build	+0:38 · Air · 12 Sep · Replay
9	DRM	7:49	+0:39	Air	5 Sep	Replay	Started as Cortex · 8v8 · version r31221112 games with this build	+0:39 · Air · 5 Sep · Replay
10	QuickNoseJacksn	7:49	+0:39	Air	28 Aug	Replay	Started as Cortex · 8v8 · version r3111512 games with this build	+0:39 · Air · 28 Aug · Replay
11	El_Turco	7:51	+0:41	Air	8 Oct	Replay	Started as Cortex · 8v8 · version r31516120 games with this build	+0:41 · Air · 8 Oct · Replay
12	Vilageidot	7:53	+0:44	Air	20 Sep	Replay	Started as Cortex · 8v8 · version r3135746 games with this build	+0:44 · Air · 20 Sep · Replay
13	SwampTurtle	7:54	+0:44	Air	25 Sep	Replay	Started as Cortex · 8v8 · version r3140525 games with this build	+0:44 · Air · 25 Sep · Replay
14	dachouf	7:54	+0:44	Air	2 Oct	Replay	Started as Cortex · 8v8 · version r3147949 games with this build	+0:44 · Air · 2 Oct · Replay
15	Horobchyk	7:54	+0:44	Air	30 Sep	Replay	Started as Cortex · 8v8 · version r3145065 games with this build	+0:44 · Air · 30 Sep · Replay

How these records work

Each account appears once with its fastest recorded single-game completion in the selected filters. This is not an average or an optimal build deadline.
Times use the game clock from match start. Units handed unfinished to an ally still count for their original recorded starter when they complete.
Initial stock, instant start/finish restoration-compatible events, enemy ownership before completion and unresolved earlier completions are excluded.
Creator credit identifies observed start ownership, not who paid, assisted construction or made the best strategic decision.
Only verified human PvP with validated resource/build settings is included. Naval balance tweaks may be enabled or disabled; other unsupported or unknown settings are excluded. All ratings qualify.
Maps use their normal options. Games with changed or unverified map options are excluded.
The source public history starts at five-minute games. This inherited coverage limit can omit a faster completion from a shorter game.
Faction filters select the actual completed unit faction, which may differ from the player starting faction. Verified mirrored positions are combined.
Different team sizes allow different assistance. Each replay shows its format; these are recorded achievements, not isolated mechanical skill.
Observed games counts games with a qualifying completion for that account in the selected filters, not every game played.
Games shorter than 5 minutes are not in the data, so a faster time in a shorter game could be missing.
Ties share a rank. Every player counts once, whatever the map version or format.